In a split decision of 3-2, the justices directed Mark to return to the Federal High Court for further hearings related to ongoing leadership disputes within the party. This ruling came as a response to an appeal by the ADC, challenging earlier decisions that had favored competing factions. Justice Emeka Nwite and Justice Joyce Abdulmalik were among those who voiced their opinions during this pivotal moment for Nigerian politics.

That context matters because it illustrates the ongoing leadership crisis within the ADC, which has seen competing factions claim control. The party now faces a Federal High Court ruling that voided its recent congresses, effectively restraining it from organizing any state congresses or national conventions until further notice. This legal quagmire complicates ADC’s preparations for the 2027 elections.

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has updated its website to reflect Mark’s leadership. However, he currently cannot conduct congresses or primaries due to existing court restrictions. The clock is ticking; parties must submit their membership registers by May 10, 2026, and upload their presidential and National Assembly candidates’ names on INEC’s portal by July 11, 2026.

Political observers note that while this Supreme Court ruling offers a temporary reprieve for Mark’s faction, it does not resolve the underlying issues plaguing the ADC. Dumebi Kachikwu remarked that “the Supreme Court displayed biblical King Solomon’s wisdom” in navigating these complex disputes, highlighting how critical judicial decisions can shape political landscapes.

The challenges ahead are significant. The ADC must navigate not only internal strife but also external pressures from rival parties like the PDP. With ongoing court rulings hanging over them, how will they manage to regain full operational capacity before crucial deadlines? As it stands, Mark is expected back in court soon to address these pressing matters.

Сообщение Adc supreme court ruling: What Does the Mean for David Mark? появились сначала на naijanewsreporters.

The legal saga began when Nafiu Bala Gombe sought to challenge the legitimacy of David Mark and Rauf Aregbesola’s leadership. Gombe’s actions led to a Court of Appeal ruling that directed INEC to derecognize Mark’s leadership. This ruling was perceived as an attempt to alter the political landscape ahead of the 2027 elections, creating uncertainty within the ADC.

However, Justice Mohammed Garba, leading a five-member panel, delivered a unanimous judgment stating that the Court of Appeal overstepped its authority by issuing a preservative order while a case was still pending in trial court. He emphasized that such an order was “unwarranted and improper,” indicating that it lacked a solid legal basis.

This Supreme Court decision not only restored David Mark’s leadership but also directed all parties involved to return to the Federal High Court for an expedited hearing. This directive is crucial because it allows for a quicker resolution of ongoing disputes within the party, which could influence its strategy as Nigeria approaches critical elections.

Bolaji Abdullahi, ADC’s national spokesman, welcomed this verdict as a clear affirmation of the party’s legitimacy. He stated, “We commend the five-man panel of the Supreme Court, whose unanimous judgment has today done great credit to the judiciary in our country and our political system.” Abdullahi’s remarks reflect a sense of relief within the party as they navigate these turbulent waters.

The implications are far-reaching. With this ruling, ADC can now move forward without the shadow of legal challenges clouding its leadership structure. The reinstatement also means that INEC must recognize David Mark’s leadership officially, allowing him and his team to prepare adequately for upcoming political battles.

The next steps for both David Mark and Rauf Aregbesola involve strategizing for their campaign ahead of the 2027 elections. As they gear up for this crucial period, their focus will likely be on consolidating support within their ranks and addressing any lingering divisions that may have arisen during this legal tussle.

Сообщение Adc supreme court: What Does the Ruling Mean for Nigerian Politics? появились сначала на naijanewsreporters.

The Supreme Court has fixed April 14, 2026, for the hearing of Mark’s appeal, marked SC/CV/180/2026. This appeal follows a Court of Appeal ruling on March 12, which deemed Mark’s case as incompetent and unmeritorious. The legal tussle began when Bala, who claims to be the acting national chairman of the ADC, filed a suit to prevent the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from recognizing Mark’s faction.

On April 1, 2026, INEC announced it would no longer recognize either faction of the ADC, led by Mark or Bala. This decision has heightened the stakes in the ongoing dispute, prompting Mark to file a motion requesting the court to compel INEC to restore their names and recognize them as members of the party’s national working committee.

As the Supreme Court prepares for the hearing, a five-member panel led by Justice Mohammed Garba has granted accelerated hearing in the appeal. The court has scheduled the hearing for April 22, 2026, a critical date for both factions as they vie for control of the party.

In a related ruling, the Supreme Court recently set aside a judgment from the Court of Appeal regarding the appointment of counsel for Nestoil and Neconde, stating that these entities remain valid legal entities and retain the right to engage counsel of their choice. This ruling underscores the court’s role in ensuring that legal entities can defend their interests effectively.

Mark’s appeal is not just a personal battle; it reflects broader issues within the ADC and the political landscape in Nigeria. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for party politics and governance in the country.

As the April 22 hearing approaches, the political atmosphere is charged with anticipation. Observers are keenly watching how the Supreme Court will navigate this complex leadership dispute, which could set a precedent for future party conflicts in Nigeria.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding any potential resolutions or compromises that may emerge from this ongoing legal saga. The leadership of the ADC hangs in the balance as both factions await the Supreme Court’s decision.

Сообщение Supreme court: What is the ‘s Role in the Leadership Dispute of the African Democratic Congress? появились сначала на naijanewsreporters.

The Federal Government of Nigeria has proposed a budget allocation of N135.22 billion for electoral adjudication and post-election matters in its 2026 budget. This allocation, part of the 2026 Appropriation Bill, falls under the Service-Wide Votes and represents approximately 3.65% of the total Consolidated Revenue Fund charges, which amount to N3.70 trillion.

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has projected a requirement of N873.78 billion to conduct the upcoming 2027 general elections. Additionally, INEC has requested N171 billion for its operations in the 2026 fiscal year. The new line item for electoral adjudication has raised eyebrows, as it was not previously stated in the proposed budget.

Critics have voiced concerns regarding the N135.22 billion allocation, which represents 21% of the total statutory transfers of N4.80 trillion. Human rights lawyer Femi Falana labeled the proposed expenditure as “excessive and unjustifiable,” while Anthony Ubani of #FixPolitics Africa suggested that the allocation reflects deeper flaws within Nigeria’s electoral system.

Ini Ememobong, a political analyst, pointed out that INEC’s budgetary expectations indicate a lack of confidence in the electoral process, stating, “It means that INEC itself is anticipating that it will not do well and that people will not accept the outcome of the results.” This sentiment underscores the growing skepticism surrounding the integrity of elections in Nigeria.

Prof Pat Utomi further criticized the allocation, questioning the rationale behind the Federal Government’s budget for electoral processes, stating, “It is not the Federal Government that goes to elections, it is the individual candidates, so why should the Federal Government have a budget for it?” Such remarks highlight the ongoing debate about the role of government funding in elections.

In a broader context, Japan has enacted its largest fiscal budget in history, amounting to ¥122.3 trillion (€664 billion) for 2026. This budget was approved by the upper house of parliament following an emergency stopgap budget enacted on March 30, 2026. The contrast between Japan’s fiscal approach and Nigeria’s electoral funding raises questions about governance and priorities in different political landscapes.

The allocation for electoral adjudication and post-election matters indicates ongoing fiscal pressure from election-related legal disputes in Nigeria. As the country prepares for the 2027 general elections, observers are keenly watching how these budgetary decisions will impact the electoral landscape and whether they will address the concerns raised by critics. Details remain unconfirmed regarding the exact implications of this budget on the electoral process.

Сообщение Budget: What does Nigeria’s 2026 reveal about electoral funding? появились сначала на naijanewsreporters.

What does Atiku Abubakar’s recent $1.2 million lobbying deal signify for the landscape of Nigerian politics? This agreement, signed with the lobbying firm Von Batten-Montague-York, L.C., aims to enhance Abubakar’s public image and influence in the United States.

The contract was executed on March 9 and 10, 2026, and will cover a 12-month period, with payments made in six installments. The firm plans to arrange meetings between Abubakar and key U.S. officials, including members of Congress, to counterbalance the narratives propagated by the Nigerian government.

This move comes at a critical time for the African Democratic Congress (ADC), which has been embroiled in internal disputes following the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) announcement on April 1, 2026, that it would not recognize the ADC’s leadership. The firm has highlighted that INEC’s actions have effectively frozen Nigeria’s main opposition party, raising concerns about the ability of the opposition to participate in the democratic process.

In a statement, Von Batten-Montague-York, L.C. expressed that the current narratives are either a result of careless reporting or a coordinated effort to distort facts to serve the political interests of the Nigerian government. A political analyst remarked, “Dis na complete joke,” reflecting skepticism about the situation.

As the ADC faces challenges with factional disputes, the firm aims to engage U.S. authorities regarding INEC’s actions, emphasizing that the integrity of Nigeria’s electoral process is of direct importance to U.S. interests and global stability.

Looking ahead, the ADC is preparing for the upcoming presidential election in 2027, but uncertainties remain about how these lobbying efforts will influence the political landscape in Nigeria. Details remain unconfirmed.

Сообщение Lobbying: What Does Atiku Abubakar’s $1.2 Million Deal Mean for Nigerian Politics? появились сначала на naijanewsreporters.

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has recently engaged the US lobbying firm Von Batten-Montague-York L.C. to assist with issues related to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). This move comes amid significant turmoil within the party, as INEC has withdrawn recognition of the ADC leadership led by David Mark and Rauf Aregbesola following a court ruling.

On April 1, 2026, INEC announced it would not engage with the ADC due to ongoing legal issues, raising concerns about the party’s ability to participate in the upcoming 2027 General election. The ADC has rejected INEC’s decision to remove its leadership from the electoral commission’s portal, indicating a determination to hold its Congress despite these challenges.

Political analyst reactions have been mixed, with one stating, “Dis na complete joke,” reflecting skepticism about the ADC’s current standing. Felix Morka, a spokesperson for the All Progressives Congress (APC), downplayed the ADC’s influence, referring to its key figures as “twinkle, twinkle, little stars” with no impact.

Sule Lamido, a prominent politician, criticized those aligning with the ADC, describing them as “politically displaced” and questioning their motivations. He remarked, “You leave a party with a strong history and foundation and go to a smaller platform because you think you are powerful enough to take it over.” This sentiment underscores the challenges faced by the ADC as it attempts to solidify its position.

Despite these setbacks, the ADC is preparing for the 2027 General election amid ongoing leadership challenges. The lobbying firm Von Batten-Montague-York L.C. has stated that it represents foreign governments and international entities, not local US entities, which adds another layer of complexity to the ADC’s situation.

Concerns about the ADC’s viability in the democratic process have been raised, particularly in light of INEC’s actions. Morka attributed the ADC’s leadership crisis to internal failings, suggesting that the party’s struggles are self-inflicted.

As the ADC navigates this tumultuous landscape, observers are left to ponder the implications for Nigeria’s political landscape. The party’s future remains uncertain as it grapples with both internal and external pressures.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the ADC’s next steps and how it plans to address the challenges posed by INEC and its leadership crisis.

Сообщение African democratic congress: What are the Latest Developments for the ? появились сначала на naijanewsreporters.

In a significant development, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has filed a lawsuit against the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) in Abuja. The lawsuit, initiated on April 6, 2026, seeks to compel the CCB to investigate allegations of electoral law abuse, particularly concerning the removal of electronic transmission provisions from the recently amended Electoral Act.

The lawsuit comes in the wake of the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2026, which was passed by both chambers of the National Assembly in February and subsequently signed into law by President Bola Tinubu. Notably, Clause 60 of the new law makes the electronic transmission of results optional, raising concerns about transparency in the electoral process.

In addition to the electronic transmission issue, the new law imposes stringent requirements on political candidates. As many as 50% of candidates for the upcoming 2027 elections may face disqualification due to new tax compliance requirements. These stipulations mandate that candidates provide a Tax Clearance Certificate (TCC) linked to their National Identification Number (NIN) and company registration number.

The Nigeria Revenue Service has introduced an Integrated Tax Compliance Portal (ITCP) to facilitate automated verification of these TCCs. Furthermore, the Electoral Act maintains strict 14-day deadlines for pre-election challenges, which could further complicate the electoral landscape.

Critics argue that the new law disproportionately targets individuals outside the current power structure. An anonymous member of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) described the tax compliance requirement as “a political purge disguised as tax administration.” Meanwhile, Senator Kawu Sumaila emphasized the importance of responsible financial contribution for those aspiring to manage national resources.

Chief Aiyenale Fred Jimoh remarked, “The era of the politically powerful who operate outside the fiscal system is over,” highlighting a shift towards greater accountability.

These developments follow a contentious legislative process, marked by alterations to the bill’s provisions without adequate debate or due process. As the situation unfolds, reactions from various stakeholders continue to emerge, reflecting a mix of support and criticism for the new electoral regulations.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the full implications of these changes, but the ongoing lawsuit and new compliance requirements are set to shape the political landscape in Nigeria as the 2027 elections approach.

Сообщение Election law: What Are the Latest Developments in in Nigeria? появились сначала на naijanewsreporters.

Hadiza Jega, the wife of former Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) chairman Attahiru Jega, has passed away. This tragic news has prompted an outpouring of condolences from various quarters, highlighting her significant impact and the loss felt by those who knew her.

The Janazah prayer for Hadiza Jega is scheduled to take place immediately after Zuhr at the National Mosque in Abuja on April 5, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. This event will serve as a gathering for family, friends, and associates to pay their final respects.

Bayero University, Kano, where Attahiru Jega currently serves as a professor of political science, confirmed the news of her passing in an official statement. The university expressed deep sorrow over the loss, stating, “Inna lillahi wa inna ilaihi raji’un. With total submission to the will of Allah, we announce the passing of Hajiya Hadiza Attahiru Jega.”

Attahiru Jega, who served as INEC chairman from 2010 to 2015, is remembered for his contributions to Nigeria’s electoral process. His wife, Hadiza, was described by President Bola Tinubu as a woman of uncommon grace and character. In a heartfelt message, Tinubu expressed his condolences, stating, “Dear Professor Jega, it is with a heavy heart that I receive the news of the passing of your beloved wife of over 40 years. Hajiya was an exceptional woman.”

Vice-President Kashim Shettima also attended the Janazah prayer, further emphasizing the high regard in which Hadiza Jega was held within the community. Shettima’s presence signifies the impact of her legacy and the respect afforded to the Jega family.

As the community mourns, many are reflecting on Hadiza Jega’s life and the contributions she made alongside her husband. Observers note that her passing is not just a loss for the Jega family but for all who valued her kindness and character.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding any further arrangements or tributes planned in her honor. However, it is clear that Hadiza Jega’s memory will live on through the lives she touched and the legacy she leaves behind.

Сообщение Attahiru jega: What Happened to ‘s Wife? появились сначала на naijanewsreporters.

“General Sani Abacha, once presumed face of oppression, will be remembered as seemingly more democratic and more respectful of human rights than the so-called champions of activism from the NADECO days,” stated Peter Obi, igniting a firestorm of criticism.

Obi’s remarks, made in a recent interview, have drawn sharp rebuke from various political figures, including Femi Fani-Kayode, who called the comments “offensive to the memory of those who fought against military dictatorship.” Fani-Kayode warned that such statements could jeopardize Obi’s aspirations for the presidency.

Kayode Oladele, another political commentator, described Obi’s statement as “naive and reckless,” arguing that it distorts Nigeria’s democratic history. The backlash highlights the sensitivity surrounding the legacy of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), which played a crucial role in the pro-democracy struggle following the annulment of the June 12, 1993 presidential election.

NADECO members sacrificed their comfort and safety to restore democracy during a time when the Abacha regime was notorious for its repression and human rights violations. The context of Obi’s comments is particularly poignant given the ongoing discussions about Nigeria’s democratic evolution.

Fani-Kayode further emphasized the gravity of the situation, stating, “To mock the memory of those that died fighting for democracy in the June 12 struggle and sacrificed their lives and liberty as members of NADECO in this way is unacceptable and unforgivable.”

The controversy surrounding Obi’s remarks has been exacerbated by recent developments, including the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) derecognition of certain leaders within the African Democratic Congress (ADC), which has further strained the political landscape.

As the debate continues, many are left questioning the implications of Obi’s comments on the collective memory of Nigeria’s struggle for democracy. The sacrifices made by pro-democracy activists during the NADECO era are seen as foundational to the country’s current political framework.

Obi’s comments have sparked widespread backlash, undermining the sacrifices made by those who fought for democracy. The ongoing discourse reflects the complexities of Nigeria’s political history and the challenges of reconciling past injustices with present aspirations.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the potential impact of this controversy on Obi’s political future, but it is clear that the legacy of NADECO remains a sensitive topic in Nigerian politics.

Сообщение Nadeco: Is ‘s Legacy Being Undermined by Recent Comments? появились сначала на naijanewsreporters.

Before the recent developments, the African Democratic Congress (ADC) was embroiled in a leadership crisis that had persisted since 2025. The emergence of a new National Working Committee led by David Mark in July 2025 had created factions within the party, leading to confusion and disputes over leadership recognition.

However, a decisive moment occurred when the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) halted recognition of the rival factions within the ADC, pending the resolution of the leadership dispute. This action was taken in response to a Court of Appeal order that directed all parties to maintain the status quo ante bellum, although the court did not clarify what that status quo entailed.

As a result of INEC’s decision, key figures within the ADC, including Ralph Nwosu and others, found their names removed from INEC’s official portal, which sparked outrage among party members. David Mark accused the ruling All Progressives Congress of manipulating INEC to weaken opposition parties ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Oluwole Osaze-Uzzi, a prominent ADC member, challenged INEC’s interpretation of the court order, stating, “The court did not say that INEC should withdraw recognition from either faction. It never did say so.” This highlights the ambiguity surrounding the court’s directive and the potential implications for the ADC’s internal democracy.

The Nigeria Civil Society Situation Room expressed concern over INEC’s actions, warning that they could undermine internal party democracy. They noted, “The invocation of status quo ante bellum in this instance risks entrenching ambiguity and sustaining contested authority within the ADC.”

With the ADC facing a critical juncture, the uncertainty surrounding the definition of the status quo ante bellum and its implications for the party’s future remains a pressing issue. Details remain unconfirmed regarding how this situation will evolve and what it means for the upcoming elections.

As the political landscape shifts, the ADC must navigate these challenges carefully. The stakes are high, with David Mark asserting that the agenda is clear: to create a scenario where, in 2027, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu emerges as the only viable option for the electorate.

In this context, INEC’s role is crucial. Osaze-Uzzi emphasized, “INEC must preserve the party, not create a vacuum,” underscoring the need for clarity and fairness in the electoral process.

As the ADC grapples with these developments, the outcome of this leadership dispute will likely have lasting effects on the party and its ability to compete in future elections.

Сообщение Status quo ante bellum: What Does the Mean for the African Democratic Congress? появились сначала на naijanewsreporters.